DOE EERE Research Reports

Distributed Energy Resources and CHP

CHP Integration Testing

CHP Demonstation Projects at Federal Facilities
January 2002
Steven K. Fischer
Patrick J. Hughes
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Oak Ridge, Tennessee

Steven W. Carlson
Hugh I. Henderson
CDH Energy Corp.
Evansville, Wisconsin and Cazenovia, New York

Abstract: Severe winter and summer weather, combined with energy prices seemingly spiraling out of control, have caused people in both the private and public sectors to consider combined heat and power (CHP). These systems, combining on-site generation of electricity with heat recovery for space heating, potable hot water, or indirect-fired absorption chillers for air conditioning, can result in significant cost and energy savings. Organizations in different branches of the U.S. government are at various stages in the design and installation of CHP projects. The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) is working with three of these organizations and their private sector partners to document CHP energy savings through pre-and post-retrofit monitoring of system operation and energy use and through computer modeling with typical year hourly weather data. Documentation of these success stories is expected to provide compelling arguments for other federal agencies to install CHP systems.

Sufficient pre-retrofit data have been collected at one site (the 82nd Heating and Cooling Steam Plant at Fort Bragg, North Carolina) to perform an analysis and project possible fuel use and electrical production. One configuration of equipment is considered—three 3.5 MW gas turbines with heat recovery steam generators and a supplemental boiler for peak loading—and compared with the existing gas-fired steam boiler plant. Turbine operation is controlled to meet the distribution system thermal loads, while electricity produced offsets purchases that would be made from the local utility. It is projected that one gas turbine would operate continuously, a second would operate at full load 92% of the time and at part load 8% of the time, and that the third would operate at full-load 54% of the time and at part load 38% of the time and would be idle 8% of the time. Gas turbine operation would provide 495.2 (469,700 ×106 Btu) of the 583.5 TJ (553,400 × 106 Btu) annual thermal load while producing 86,490 MWh of electricity; natural gas use increases from 748 TJ (7.10 × 106 therms) using the steam boilers to 1210 TJ (11.5 ×106 therms) for the turbines and supplemental boiler.

Estimated reductions in energy costs are heavily dependent on the relative costs of electricity and natural gas. On-site generation avoids purchases of approximately $2.5 million of electricity based on the average real time prices for 1998 through 2000. The net difference in costs for natural gas between the existing boiler plant and the proposed gas turbine plant is about $1.61 million. Savings in energy costs would be approximately $890,000 per year using average 1999 natural gas rates for industrial customers in North Carolina.


Keywords: combined cooling heating and power, CHP, cogeneration, gas turbine

Availability:
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers

This publication is protected by U.S. copyright laws and is not available for viewing or download.

view or download report

Reference:
ASHRAE Transactions 2002
Vol. 108, Pt. 1
AC-02-18-4
 
DOE EERE R&D Reports | DER & CHP | CHP Integration | Site Map | Key Word Index
 
ORNL Home | Engineering Science & Technology | Cooling, Heating, and Power
Comments & Contacts | Disclaimer

 
U.S. Department of Energy Logo
 
UT-Battelle LLC Logo
 
ORNL Logo