Moisture Control in Low-Slope Roofing: A New Design Requirement

A.O. Desjarlais and J.E. Christian, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
N. A. Byars, University of North Carolina Charlotte

Contents:

Abstract

Introduction

Moisture Control Strategies Presently Employed

Proposed Moisture Control Strategy

Developing the Algorithms

Using the Algorithms

An Example

Comparison with Existing Methods

Conclusions/Future Work

References


Calculator

Developing the Algorithms

Computer simulations are quite effective in predicting the ability of a roofing system to prevent problems with moisture accumulation. However, it is necessary to set up, run and analyze a computer simulation in order to determine the results. Algorithms were therefore developed in order to predict the moisture control performance of a roofing system without having to perform and analyze the results of a computer simulation. These algorithms can then be included in a fast, user-friendly program, or performed using a hand calculator, which makes the information available to a much wider group. This will enable the roofing professional in the US to quickly and accurately determine if a roof constructed with a given type of membrane, insulation material and deck will be moisture-tolerant in a given location on a building controlled to a specific indoor relative humidity, without the need to set up and run a computer simulation.

The algorithms were developed using a database of 600 simulations. Five different climates were analyzed: Bismarck, Chicago, Knoxville, Miami, and Seattle. These were selected to represent the range of heating degree days (HDD) seen in the continental US. Indoor relative humidities of 40%, 50%, and 60% with an indoor temperature of 68°F were used in the study.

The range of roofing configurations evaluated included 1-inch and 3-inch thick wood fiberboard, 1-inch and 3-inch polyisocyanurate (PIR) insulation, and a 3-inch composite of the two. Four metal decks with permeances of 0.64, 1, 5, and 10 English perms were included. Two values for membrane absorptance of 0.7 for a white roof and 0.1 for a black roof were also used. All possible combinations of the above parameters were simulated using the finite-difference model. Table 1 shows the roof properties and environmental conditions analyzed [1].

This database was analyzed for each of the quantifiable moisture control requirements to develop the predictive algorithms. Multiple linear regression was done using combinations of first, second, third order and inverse terms of each of the variables to develop the necessary correlations. See Reference [9] for details regarding the production of these algorithms.

Table 1

Roof System Properties Varied
Insulation Type Insulation Thickness Membrane Absorptance Deck Permeance
Fiberboard 1 inch 0.1 (black) 0.64 Eng perms
Polyisocyanurate (PIR) 3 inches 0.7 (white) 1.0 Eng perms
Composite 5.0 Eng perms
(Fiberboard +PIR) 10.0 Eng perms

Environmental Conditions Varied
Climate Heating degree days Building Interior Relative Humidity
Bismarck 8992 40%
Chicago 6151 50%
Knoxville 3818 60%
Miami 185
Seattle 5280

Previous Section - Proposed Moisture Control Strategy
Next Section - Using the Algorithms

Building Envelope Research
Oak Ridge National Laboratory

For more information, contact the program manager for Building Envelope Research:

André O. Desjarlais
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
P. O. Box 2008, MS 6070
Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6070

E-mail Andre Desjarlais


Revised: May 26, 2004 by Juanita Denton